A model for the communication of medically relevant in- formation: how to proceed with users with unscientific convictions? Letter to the editor
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022), Letter to the Editor
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022)

A model for the communication of medically relevant in- formation: how to proceed with users with unscientific convictions? Letter to the editor

Letter to the Editor
Published 2021-06-30
Ibrahinm Enriquez-Garrido
Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Asunción, Paraguay
Vol. 2 - N° 1
PDF (Español (España))

How to Cite

Enriquez-Garrido, I. . (2021). A model for the communication of medically relevant in- formation: how to proceed with users with unscientific convictions? Letter to the editor. UMAX Scientific Journal, 2(1), 63–66. Retrieved from https://revista.umax.edu.py/index.php/rcumax/article/view/12
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

En el presente momento, al igual que en los últimos años, existe una considerable brecha entre el consenso científico y la opinión pública en determinados temas.

PDF (Español (España))

References

(1) van Panhuis WG, Grefenstette J, Jung SY, Chok NS, Cross A, Eng H, et al. Contagious Diseases in the United States from 1888 to the Pre-sent. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 28 de noviembre de 2013 [citado 8 de noviembre de 2020];369(22):2152-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ PMC4175560/

(2) Smith TC, Novella SP. HIV Denial in the Internet Era. PLOS Med [In-ternet]. 21 de agosto de 2007 [citado 8 de noviembre de 2020];4(8):e256. Disponible en: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040256

(3) Roozenbeek J, Schneider CR, Dryhurst S, Kerr J, Freeman ALJ, Rec-chia G, et al. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. R Soc Open Sci [Internet]. [citado 6 de noviembre de 2020];7(10):201199. Disponible en: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/ rsos.201199

(4) Vulpe S. Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy as

(5) Extended Attitudes. Eur Rev Appl Sociol [Internet].

(6) 1 de junio de 2020 [citado 30 de octubre de 2020];13(20):43-57. Disponible en: https://content. sciendo.com/view/journals/eras/13/20/article-p43. xml

(7) Chan EY. Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personal Individ Differ [Internet]. 21 de octu-bre de 2020 [citado 6 de noviembre de 2020];110463. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0191886920306541

(8) Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bound-ed rationality. Am Psychol [Internet]. 2003 [citado 13 de noviembre de 2020];58(9):697-720. Disponible en: http://doi.apa. org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697

(9) Rossen I, Hurlstone MJ, Dunlop PD, Lawrence C. Accepters, fence sit-ters, or rejecters: Moral profiles of vaccination attitudes. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. marzo de 2019 [citado 13 de noviembre de 2020];224:23-

(10) Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Ibrahinm Enriquez-Garrido

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.